Closed-loop Ethics

Brain-machine-interface developed by BrainLinks-BrainTools to assist paralyzed patients with drinking. Photo: Gunnar Grah

Neurotechnologies need a supportive social awareness

In a recent article for the „Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics“, BrainLinks-BrainTools scientists PD Dr. Tonio Ball, Dr. Philipp Kellmeyer and PD Dr. Oliver Müller (amongst other authors) have addressed neuroethical challenges of closed-loop devices.

Closed-loop medical devices such as brain-computer interfaces are an emerging and rapidly advancing technology that can affect personal autonomy, decisionmaking capacity, and agency of target patients. The Freiburg researchers advocate the development of a comprehensive ethical and legal framework concerning its future medical applications. They also stress informed consent and refusal as a means to foster accountability. To create an international neuroethics task force consisting of scientists from different fields as well as of non-scientists could help to advance these plans.

 

Original publication:

Philipp Kellmeyer, Thomas Cochrane, Oliver Müller, Christine Mitchell, Tonio Ball, Joseph J. Fins & Nikola Biller-Andorno (2016): The Effects of Closed-Loop Medical Devices on the Autonomy and Accountability of Persons and Systems. In: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, pp. 623-633. DOI: 10.1017/S0963180116000359